Your tenancy model is a margin decision.

It depends on what your customers will demand and what your margin can carry. Shared tables are cheapest and need rigorous tenant-aware access control; separate schemas or databases isolate better and cost more to operate. The decision is commercial as much as technical, and it is expensive to reverse.

That request is the moment tenancy decisions made in month three present their bill. The honest answer depends on whether your data layer can be partitioned by region without rewriting the application. We assess that first, because the answer decides whether this is weeks of work or a quarter.

SSO, granular permissions, audit trails, data residency and a security questionnaire you can answer without a scramble. Most of it affects architecture, so it is far cheaper designed in early than retrofitted during a deal. We work out which of it your target buyer actually asks for.

Yes, and it usually starts with knowing it, which many teams do not. Cost attribution per tenant, then the architecture that drives it — database design, background processing, storage tiers, and for AI features the inference spend. Gross margin is an engineering outcome as much as a pricing one.

Frequently. We start with a short audit of the codebase, the infrastructure and the release process, then agree what needs attention first. Taking over a product does not mean rewriting it, and the parts carrying most of the risk are usually fewer than they look.

Yes, and it is the arrangement we prefer. Your team holds the product context, we bring capacity or a specific capability, and both work to the same roadmap. What we avoid is a parallel team building in isolation, which produces integration debt nobody planned for.